Comments on: In praise of failure http://expbook.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/in-praise-of-failure/ (``Logbook" was taken already...) Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:35:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Lior http://expbook.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/in-praise-of-failure/#comment-3248 Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:09:50 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=8730#comment-3248 Thanks for the interesting story. It now made the latest Physics – http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/111

]]> By: James http://expbook.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/in-praise-of-failure/#comment-3211 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:32:40 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=8730#comment-3211 I [2] think Moses should be applauded for his willingness to go with the evidence.

[2] The one to have made the stiffening observation – not to brag or anything ;)

]]> By: Massimo http://expbook.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/in-praise-of-failure/#comment-3210 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:09:32 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=8730#comment-3210 Your author list is a bit too short for that…

]]> By: Schlupp http://expbook.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/in-praise-of-failure/#comment-3209 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:08:25 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=8730#comment-3209 Only PRL? No Nature or Science?

]]> By: Massimo http://expbook.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/in-praise-of-failure/#comment-3208 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:54:21 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=8730#comment-3208 As you can see I quickly approved your comment, and as we both know, that counts as a PRL…

]]> By: Schlupp http://expbook.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/in-praise-of-failure/#comment-3207 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:52:38 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=8730#comment-3207 I raise my ( largely nonexistent) hat to Chan. The inability to even consider changing one’s mind upon further evidence is in my opinion one of the biggest issues in high-Tc superconductivity.

]]>