Comments on: Does not get much sillier than this… http://expbook.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/does-not-get-much-sillier-than-this/ (``Logbook" was taken already...) Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:35:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Massimo http://expbook.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/does-not-get-much-sillier-than-this/#comment-2160 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:17:06 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=6460#comment-2160 Well, I thought my third one might be circular too…

]]> By: Losby http://expbook.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/does-not-get-much-sillier-than-this/#comment-2159 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:06:27 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=6460#comment-2159 Interesting loop, Yuan. I thought to myself, this could easily be changed with a quick wiki edit. I was chatting with a friend at the time and he looked at the edit history:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationality&diff=434310493&oldid=434205824

Look at that. Just a few days ago the first link would have been “philosophy”.

Perhaps it was an inside job, because philosophers are not rational :D .

]]> By: Yuan Wan http://expbook.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/does-not-get-much-sillier-than-this/#comment-2158 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:02:43 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=6460#comment-2158 What I found is a deadlock:

1. Reason
2. Rationality
3.Reason
4….

]]> By: Devin Baillie http://expbook.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/does-not-get-much-sillier-than-this/#comment-2157 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:52:51 +0000 http://expbook.wordpress.com/?p=6460#comment-2157 Try “Paleolithic”.

]]>